The Transit of Venus –
by David Le Conte
The first transit of Venus across the disc of the Sun since 1882 was witnessed by a group of Astronomy Section members at the Astronomical Observatory. Preparations started at 04.30 Universal Time (UT), setting up the 6-inch coelostat about one metre from its normal position, in order to catch the early morning Sun, which had risen at 04.05 UT.
Our prime objective was to record the times of the four contacts, when the disc of Venus touched the limb of the disc of the Sun. We had pre-registered the details and locations of all instruments with the European Southern Observatory, which was coordinating observations world-wide, and calculating values of the astronomical unit from the data. The unit is, of course, very well known, and this was, therefore, an academic exercise designed to gain an insight into the methods used in the 18th and 19th centuries, when such transits were regarded as providing important opportunities for accurate determination of the scale of the solar system.
A further objective was to record the event photographically. I attempted digital photography of the first contact with the Takahashi, not very successfully, but did obtain good images of the coelostat image.
Conditions were perfect for the start of the transit, at
Despite the lack
of visibility we were able to show a constant stream of visitors our images,
and computer simulations followed the course of the transit in real time. The
The results of our observations were as follows. All times are in UT. No times were recorded for the Celestron, and I did not record the first contact time with the Takahashi, using it for photography instead.
The predicted contact times 2 were:
Contact
Contact
The accepted value 3 of the astronomical unit (AU) is 149,597,870 km.
Telescope Ceolostat Meade Takahashi
Observer Harris Spicer Le Conte
Contact
AU (km) 150,458,302 150,281,206 -
Error (%) + 0.575 + 0.457 -
Contact
AU (km) 149,260,158 148,945,078 149,276,294
Error (%) - 0.226 - 0.436 - 0.215
Average:
AU (km) 149,859,210 149,613,142 149,276,294
Error (%) + 0.175 + 0.010 - 0.215
Contact 3: - - -
Contact 4: - - -
Average of three independent observers: 149,582,882 km
Difference between observed value and accepted value: 14,988 km
Error - 0.01%
The final result was remarkably accurate, which I attributed to the relatively large positive and negative errors fortuitously cancelling each other out.
We noted the considerable differences in recorded times between observers using different instruments: 22 seconds for the first contact, and up to 41 seconds for the second contact. Even those observing the contact on the projected coelostat image interpreted what they saw differently. As expected, the first contact was particularly difficult to record, as, of course, Venus was not visible until its black disc started appearing against the bright solar limb. But even the second contact was problematic.
The differences were not, we believe, because of the infamous ‘black drop’ effect, which, in the 18th and 19th centuries, was blamed for observational inaccuracies. Indeed, there was very little evidence of a black drop (an observation confirmed by other reports published on the Internet). Rather, it was simply because it was found quite difficult to judge when the contact actually occurred. I found myself changing my mind during the event as to when to record it as having happened. It is not surprising, therefore, that the calculations of the astronomical unit showed considerable variations.
The second of the
current pair of transits, on
References:
2. Computed by the author using StarryNight Pro software.
3.
P Kenneth Seidelmann (ed.): Explanatory Supplement to the Astronomical
Almanac, University Science Books,
4. Computed by the author using SkyMap Pro and StarryNight Pro software.
This report was originally published in the Transactions of La Société Guernesiaise (Vol. XXV, Part IV, pages 600-2).
Romanian translation of this page by Web Geek Science
visitors since 25 May 2009.